Liz Buchanan BVSc MRCVS
Keymaster
Hi - I don't know your vet and am not about to take sides in a disagreement that I know nothing about, so I will speak as I find.
Radiographs are usually interpreted by the vet who took them and interpretation is generally part of the cost of the rads. Therefore, if you have paid to have a cat radiographed, you can also expect to have had an interpretation of the results (unless - very rarely - there are extenuating circumstances which make this inappropriate). This process is known as the first opinion. My commenting on a radiograph without permission or history from your vet would constitute a second opinion and remains against general professional standards.  This convention exists to save another vet trying to interpret radiographs out of social or medical context, which of course can be dangerous for the patient and confusing for the owner. As it happens, we cannot offer that service in any case (please see the site rules that you agreed to).
If you search for Sarah Caney's website iCatcare, you will find an excellent article about FIV and how to responsibly prevent its spread. Most vets have FIV positive cats on their books - it is quite common and not seen as a reason in itself to euthanase a cat. However, owners do need to take steps to prevent the virus being passed on to other people's cats.
Given that most vets do treat owned FIV positive cats, I think it may be worthwhile exploring why it was that your vet could not treat this one. Perhaps it was connected to funding, for example? It is not normal for vets to treat a stray cat free of charge (although they will always provide emergency treatment), as there are shelters and groups available whose role it is to take strays on, treat and re-home them; they are set up and funded for that, so a stray cat shouldn't lose out (especially if they turn up with the radiograph and FIV test already taken care of).
It sounds as though contacting your local rescue is probably the next step. Best of luck to the lovely boy.
Report