Liz Buchanan BVSc MRCVS
Keymaster
Upset by the vagueness of my previous answer, I checked the VetHelpDirect blog to see what our site researchers had found most recently about Raw feeding and found it to be well explained. https://vethelpdirect.com/vetblog/2022/03/08/why-vets-dont-recommend-raw-diets/
This seemed to me to be rather one-sided so to double-check, I consulted the Webinar Vet on the issue. The Webinar Vet are a primary educator of working vets (we all do 35 hours of extra training every year, with experts of the subjects, and most of us a good deal more than that). Their job is to inform vets of the latest evidence-based changes in veterinary medicine (because we can't all be experts in all of it) and I remember them as being evidence-based (rather than opinions based) about different diets in the past. However, it seems that the evidence is quite strong. Expert vet nurse Georgia Woods-Lee can be found explaining how research has shown that ninety per cent and upward of Raw diets fed to dogs are nutritionally inadequate, especially when fed over a long time. Furthermore, the pathogen risk of feeding RAW diets is very high; apparently soap and water are not sufficient to remove the pathogens, such as bacteria, from raw dog-food (as usually fed), from dishes and plates. Nor can I find who the 10% or less are who are feeding RAW diets in a nutritionally adequate manner, so I would simply recommend that you don't feed raw diets unless overseen by a vet with qualifications in nutrition.
Report