Liz Buchanan BVSc
Keymaster
Hello and thankyou for this question which will resonate with a lot of people. I'm not sure where you are, but in the UK so far it has generally been expected that one has a single vet - like a human GP - who is responsible for their healthcare. However, the landscape is varied; vets have long referred complicated cases for specialist care. End of life care in my town can go to dedicated, mobile euthanasia specialists who do house calls (although I would like to state that the image from the comments of GP vets being euthanased on a cold metal tables in vet surgeries doesn't ring true at all). Mobile Vaccinations provision is a possibility; it has to be performed by a vet who has to examine the pet first and for older animals - particularly those needing medication - it usually doubles as a time for the vet to check how the meds are working, to weigh your pet and make sure that they don't need to be looking into any gradual changes. If this were to be done by an external provider, they would have to carry the same vaccine types as your vet and able to access your pets' clinical notes. They may not be so well equipped for picking up and dealing with side issues; they would not, for example, have weights recorded for the last few years in order to spot changes early. They would need a good relationship with your existing vet because if they were to pick up a heart murmur, signs of hyperthyroidism or a subtle limp, would they be the ones to make decisions about this? Or would they refer the decisions back to your vet, which would take time and clinical judgement and possibly require a fee? Does your vet charge a consultation fee anyway if a vaccine check turns into eg and unexpected heart consultation? When using an external provider, it is a good idea to speak to your vet in advance, to make sure that they are happy with this and to have this kind of decision clear from the start. ..... Part 2 coming up.
Report