Did you know that your vet is now a doctor? The Royal College of Veterinary Surgeons has just changed the rules. Vets are not obliged to call themselves “Doctor”, but we now have the option to do so, if we wish.
Traditionally, vets were called “Mr”: the logic was that as “veterinary surgeons”, we fell into the same (slightly superior) category of medical personnel as medical consultant surgeons, who were also “Mr”. Dentists (dental surgeons) were also called “Mr” for the same reason.
In the past thirty years, two factors have moved against this traditional nomenclature.
The veterinary profession has been feminised.
In the 1960’s, over 80% of veterinary graduates were male. The gender ratio moved to 50:50 in the 1980’s, and it’s now changed so that a high majority of new graduates are female, 57% of the total profession in practice are female. Why is this relevant to the “doctor” issue? Well, “Mr” may be a handy title for male vets, but there’s a dilemma for females: there’s an awkward choice between Miss (“young and single?”), Mrs (“married”) or Ms (“feminist?”). The term “Dr” is gender neutral, which suits our politically correct era.
Most vets around the world are “doctors”
The second, and probably more significant, reason for change in terminology is to keep the UK within international norms. In nearly every other country in the world, vets are known as “Dr”. So when British vets travel overseas, it causes mild consternation if they try to stick to the “Mr” title from home. And when foreign vets visit the UK, they naturally expect to be called “Dr”, leading to some confusion for members of the public (“Are they better qualified than British vets?”)
Vets, vet nurses and the public voted for vets to be doctors
The decision to change to “Dr” was democratic: the RCVS carried out a consultation process, receiving the opinions of over 11000 people, 74% from vets, vet students and veterinary nurse, and 26% from the public. Overall, 81% were in favour of vets becoming “doctors”, 13% were against, and 6% did not mind either way.
The RCVS has placed some stipulations about how vets use the term “Dr”, to avoid the risk of misleading people about our qualifications. The two possible misapprehensions are first, that we have earned a doctorate (PhD), and second, that we are medical doctors. To avoid the risk of this happening, vets have to do one of two things. First, add the word “Veterinary Surgeon” as a post-script to our names (“Dr Pete Wedderburn, Veterinary Surgeon”) or second, add our post-nominal letters our names (“Dr Pete Wedderburn MRCVS”). This is a clear way of defining that we are “vet doctors” rather than “doctorate doctors” or “doctor doctors”. I’m sure it seems like trivial stuff to most members of the public, but to those folk who are concerned about these details, it’s very important to get it right. And it is important, that when people consult a professional, whether online or in person, that they have a correct understanding of that individual’s qualifications.
I never thought I’d be a doctor, but all of a sudden, I’ve become one without even trying. A doctor, veterinary surgeon, or a doctor, MRCVS, that is, of course.
Discussion
“Most vets around the world are “doctors”.”
Are they? In Germany, if a vet can call himself “Doctor”, if he has gone through a process of a research-based dissertation (“Doktorarbeit” or “Dissertation”) and its defense. A German vet who hasn’t done that would by no means “expect to be called Doctor” – simply because he isn’t. And I suspect that isn’t the only country in the world.
I don’t claim it is true in EVERY country, but I think it is true in most! Germany is as you say an exception, but as far as I know, the honorary title is used in most of the world even without a PhD or equivalent.
How would you know?
Because I have lots of friends and colleagues in practice all over the world
Good point, but the RCVS says that placing qualifications after the name are sufficient. Anyone can google them if in doubt.
Good point, but the RCVS says that placing qualifications after the name are sufficient. Anyone can google them if in doubt.
It should most definitely be Dr Pete Wedderburn, Veterinary Surgeon, as an example.
The lay person does not have a clue about degree abbreviations. It’s just as misleading to use them as to use nothing at all in most cases.
My MBBS is not the same as your BVMS. Does your average person know that? Not a chance.
It should most definitely be Dr Pete Wedderburn, Veterinary Surgeon, as an example.
The lay person does not have a clue about degree abbreviations. It’s just as misleading to use them as to use nothing at all in most cases.
My MBBS is not the same as your BVMS. Does your average person know that? Not a chance.
I watch quite a bit of the Bondi Vet progs, (from Australia obviously) and his clients all call him Dr. Chris. which seemed a bit peculiar when I first heard it, but it figures we would follow, now we have so many lady vets 🙂
Think it will still take a bit of convincing over here tho – we are so used to calling our vets either Mr/Mrs. …., or ‘the/a vet’ when making an appointment. I call mine by Mr then his first name cos he has an unpronouncable second one, lol
I watch quite a bit of the Bondi Vet progs, (from Australia obviously) and his clients all call him Dr. Chris. which seemed a bit peculiar when I first heard it, but it figures we would follow, now we have so many lady vets 🙂
Think it will still take a bit of convincing over here tho – we are so used to calling our vets either Mr/Mrs. …., or ‘the/a vet’ when making an appointment. I call mine by Mr then his first name cos he has an unpronouncable second one, lol